🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.